Recent Patent Cases and Generic Delays: 2023-2025 Examples

Recent Patent Cases and Generic Delays: 2023-2025 Examples

When the FDA approves a generic drug, you might assume it’ll hit pharmacy shelves soon after. But in reality, many approved generics sit on the shelf for years - not because they’re unsafe, not because they’re untested, but because of patent litigation. Between 2023 and 2025, this delay became the norm, not the exception.

Why Approved Generics Don’t Reach Patients

The FDA approved 63 first generics in 2025, according to GoodRx. That sounds like progress. But here’s the catch: the average time between FDA approval and actual market launch is now 3.2 years. That’s more than three full years of patients paying full price for brand-name drugs while cheaper versions sit idle.

The main reason? The 30-month statutory stay. When a generic company files an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) and challenges a patent with a Paragraph IV certification, the brand-name manufacturer can sue. Once they do, the FDA can’t give final approval until 30 months pass - or the court rules in favor of the generic. Even if the patent is weak, the clock keeps ticking. That’s not a safety rule. It’s a legal delay tactic.

Patent Thicketing: The Real Enemy

Brand-name companies aren’t just defending one patent anymore. They’re stacking them. In 2020, the average New Drug Application listed 12.3 patents. By 2025, that number jumped to 14.7. Some drugs now have over 20 patents listed in the FDA’s Orange Book.

Take Humira. Its core patent expired in 2016. But AbbVie filed dozens of follow-up patents on delivery methods, dosing regimens, and formulations. Each one triggered a new 30-month stay. The result? Humira kept its monopoly until 2023 - seven years past its original patent expiry. That’s not innovation. That’s patent thicketing.

Dr. Aaron Kesselheim from Harvard Medical School put it bluntly: “The current patent thicketing strategies have extended monopolies beyond the intended 20-year term by an average of 3.7 years per drug.”

Who Gets Hurt the Most?

Patients. Pharmacists. Hospitals. Medicare.

A 2025 survey by the Association for Accessible Medicines found that 82% of pharmacists regularly get asked by patients why a drug they’ve been told is “approved” still isn’t available. Top offenders? Eliquis, Trulicity, Steglatro, and Xarelto. One pharmacist on Drugs.com wrote: “We had the generic for Xarelto approved last November. But the brand company filed three new patents last month. Now we’re looking at another 30-month delay.”

Patients For Affordable Drugs Now documented 412 cases between 2023 and 2025 where people skipped doses or went without medication because generics weren’t on the shelf. The brand-name version cost an average of $487 per month. The generic? Projected at $85.

Medicare Part D spent $3.2 billion more than it should have in 2025 because of these delays, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Lawyer surrounded by patent documents in dim office, clock showing late night hours.

Complex Generics Face Longer Delays

Not all generics are created equal. Simple oral pills - like metformin or lisinopril - move faster. But injectables, inhalers, and complex formulations? They’re stuck.

In 2025, 89% of delayed complex generics faced patent-related blocks. Compare that to just 63% of simple oral solids. Oncology drugs are the worst. The average delay between FDA approval and market launch for cancer generics? 4.1 years.

Why? These drugs require more complex manufacturing. But the real bottleneck isn’t production - it’s patents. One 2025 PMC study found 14 out of 15 oncology drug shortages between 2023 and 2025 were tied to patent litigation, not supply chain issues.

Supply Chains Are a Secondary Problem

Yes, supply chain problems exist. In 37% of delayed generic launches, manufacturers cited issues with Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API). Many of these APIs come from India or China, and disruptions there can slow things down.

But here’s the key: even when supply chains are stable, patent litigation still holds up 72% of all delays, according to Drug Patent Watch. That’s more than supply, more than FDA backlog, more than manufacturing issues combined.

Leading companies like Teva and Sandoz are responding by diversifying their API suppliers. In 2022, they averaged 1.8 approved suppliers per drug. By 2025, that number rose to 3.4. It’s a smart move - but it doesn’t fix the patent problem.

The U.S. vs. The Rest of the World

The U.S. is the outlier. In Europe, the average time between generic approval and market launch is just 1.7 years. Why? No 30-month stay. No patent litigation that automatically freezes approval. Europe’s system lets generics enter as soon as they’re approved - unless a court rules the patent is valid.

In the U.S., the system is designed to favor brand companies. The 30-month stay was meant to be a temporary pause. Now it’s a weapon. And it’s being used aggressively.

Biosimilars are following the same pattern. Humira alone had 242 patents challenged in litigation. That created a 10-year exclusivity window. But even with that, 17 biosimilars were approved by Q3 2025. The system is strained, but not broken.

Torn American flag above courtroom scale weighing brand profits against cheap generic pill.

What’s Being Done About It?

The FDA has tried. Their new AI-assisted review system cut ANDA review times by 22% for non-patent cases. But for cases with litigation? Zero impact. The 30-month stay still overrides everything.

The FTC has stepped in. They filed seven enforcement actions between 2024 and 2025 against companies using patents to block competition. One case against Jazz Pharmaceuticals over Xyrem ended in February 2025 with a settlement forcing earlier generic entry.

The CREATES Act, designed to let generics get samples needed for testing, passed the House in 2024 but stalled in the Senate in 2025. No action yet.

The FDA’s new Commissioner, Dr. Peter Bach, has pledged to increase transparency in the Orange Book. That could help stop “evergreening” - the practice of listing weak or irrelevant patents just to trigger stays.

But real change needs Congress. Right now, the Hatch-Waxman Act allows unlimited patent listings. Industry groups like PhRMA oppose limits. But 67% of stakeholders surveyed by McKinsey in 2025 support capping the number of patents per drug.

What This Means for Generic Manufacturers

For small and mid-sized generic companies, the cost is crushing. The average legal bill for a patent case hit $12.7 million in 2025 - up from $9.3 million in 2023. That’s more than most small firms make in a year.

RBC Capital Markets found that 63% of delayed generics involve companies with under $500 million in annual revenue. Big players like Teva or Sandoz can absorb the cost. Smaller ones? They walk away. And that means fewer generics on the market.

To even compete, companies now start patent research 48 to 60 months before a patent expires. It’s a years-long legal chess game. And the brand companies have the board.

What’s Next?

The clock is ticking on $78.3 billion in annual brand drug sales set to lose exclusivity in 2025 alone. Stelara, Dupixent, Prolia - all are prime targets for generics. But if patent tactics stay the same, most won’t reach patients until 2027 or 2028.

Patients won’t wait. Pharmacists are already overwhelmed. Hospitals are rationing drugs. Medicare is bleeding money.

The system isn’t broken because it’s outdated. It’s broken because it’s being abused. And until Congress rewrites the rules - or courts start striking down weak patents - patients will keep paying more, and waiting longer, for the drugs they need.